 Zobacz na TensorFlow.org |  Uruchom w Google Colab |  Wyświetl źródło na GitHub |  Pobierz notatnik |
Przegląd
W tym ćwiczeniu z kodowania nauczysz się prostego modelu klasyfikacji obrazów na zestawie danych CIFAR10, a następnie użyjesz „ataku z wnioskowaniem o członkostwie” przeciwko temu modelowi, aby ocenić, czy osoba atakująca jest w stanie „odgadnąć”, czy dana próbka była obecna w zestawie uczącym . Będziesz korzystać z Raportu o prywatności TF, aby zwizualizować wyniki z wielu modeli i punktów kontrolnych modeli.
Ustawiać
import numpy as np
from typing import Tuple
from scipy import special
from sklearn import metrics
import tensorflow as tf
import tensorflow_datasets as tfds
# Set verbosity.
tf.compat.v1.logging.set_verbosity(tf.compat.v1.logging.ERROR)
from sklearn.exceptions import ConvergenceWarning
import warnings
warnings.simplefilter(action="ignore", category=ConvergenceWarning)
warnings.simplefilter(action="ignore", category=FutureWarning)
Zainstaluj Prywatność TensorFlow.
pip install tensorflow_privacy
from tensorflow_privacy.privacy.privacy_tests.membership_inference_attack import membership_inference_attack as mia
from tensorflow_privacy.privacy.privacy_tests.membership_inference_attack.data_structures import AttackInputData
from tensorflow_privacy.privacy.privacy_tests.membership_inference_attack.data_structures import AttackResultsCollection
from tensorflow_privacy.privacy.privacy_tests.membership_inference_attack.data_structures import AttackType
from tensorflow_privacy.privacy.privacy_tests.membership_inference_attack.data_structures import PrivacyMetric
from tensorflow_privacy.privacy.privacy_tests.membership_inference_attack.data_structures import PrivacyReportMetadata
from tensorflow_privacy.privacy.privacy_tests.membership_inference_attack.data_structures import SlicingSpec
from tensorflow_privacy.privacy.privacy_tests.membership_inference_attack import privacy_report
import tensorflow_privacy
Wytrenuj dwa modele z metrykami prywatności
W tej sekcji trenuje parę keras.Model klasyfikatorów na CIFAR-10 zbiorze. Podczas procesu szkoleniowego zbiera metryki prywatności, które posłużą do generowania raportów w następnej sekcji.
Pierwszym krokiem jest zdefiniowanie kilku hiperparametrów:
dataset = 'cifar10'
num_classes = 10
activation = 'relu'
num_conv = 3
batch_size=50
epochs_per_report = 2
total_epochs = 50
lr = 0.001
Następnie załaduj zbiór danych. W tym kodzie nie ma nic specyficznego dla prywatności.
print('Loading the dataset.')
train_ds = tfds.as_numpy(
tfds.load(dataset, split=tfds.Split.TRAIN, batch_size=-1))
test_ds = tfds.as_numpy(
tfds.load(dataset, split=tfds.Split.TEST, batch_size=-1))
x_train = train_ds['image'].astype('float32') / 255.
y_train_indices = train_ds['label'][:, np.newaxis]
x_test = test_ds['image'].astype('float32') / 255.
y_test_indices = test_ds['label'][:, np.newaxis]
# Convert class vectors to binary class matrices.
y_train = tf.keras.utils.to_categorical(y_train_indices, num_classes)
y_test = tf.keras.utils.to_categorical(y_test_indices, num_classes)
input_shape = x_train.shape[1:]
assert x_train.shape[0] % batch_size == 0, "The tensorflow_privacy optimizer doesn't handle partial batches"
Loading the dataset.
Następnie zdefiniuj funkcję do budowania modeli.
def small_cnn(input_shape: Tuple[int],
num_classes: int,
num_conv: int,
activation: str = 'relu') -> tf.keras.models.Sequential:
"""Setup a small CNN for image classification.
Args:
input_shape: Integer tuple for the shape of the images.
num_classes: Number of prediction classes.
num_conv: Number of convolutional layers.
activation: The activation function to use for conv and dense layers.
Returns:
The Keras model.
"""
model = tf.keras.models.Sequential()
model.add(tf.keras.layers.Input(shape=input_shape))
# Conv layers
for _ in range(num_conv):
model.add(tf.keras.layers.Conv2D(32, (3, 3), activation=activation))
model.add(tf.keras.layers.MaxPooling2D())
model.add(tf.keras.layers.Flatten())
model.add(tf.keras.layers.Dense(64, activation=activation))
model.add(tf.keras.layers.Dense(num_classes))
model.compile(
loss=tf.keras.losses.CategoricalCrossentropy(from_logits=True),
optimizer=tf.keras.optimizers.Adam(learning_rate=lr),
metrics=['accuracy'])
return model
Korzystając z tej funkcji, zbuduj dwa trójwarstwowe modele CNN.
Skonfigurować pierwszy użyć podstawowego optymalizator SGD, drugi używać różnie prywatną optymalizator ( tf_privacy.DPKerasAdamOptimizer ), dzięki czemu można porównać wyniki.
model_2layers = small_cnn(
input_shape, num_classes, num_conv=2, activation=activation)
model_3layers = small_cnn(
input_shape, num_classes, num_conv=3, activation=activation)
Zdefiniuj wywołanie zwrotne, aby zebrać dane dotyczące prywatności
Następny zdefiniować keras.callbacks.Callback do periorically przeprowadzić kilka ataków prywatności wobec modelu i rejestrowania wyników.
W Keras fit metoda wywoła on_epoch_end sposób po każdej epoki treningowej. n argument jest (0 oparte) Numer Epoką.
Można realizować tę procedurę pisząc pętlę, która wielokrotnie wywołuje Model.fit(..., epochs=epochs_per_report) i uruchamia kod ataku. Wywołanie zwrotne jest tutaj używane tylko dlatego, że wyraźnie oddziela logikę uczenia od logiki oceny prywatności.
class PrivacyMetrics(tf.keras.callbacks.Callback):
def __init__(self, epochs_per_report, model_name):
self.epochs_per_report = epochs_per_report
self.model_name = model_name
self.attack_results = []
def on_epoch_end(self, epoch, logs=None):
epoch = epoch+1
if epoch % self.epochs_per_report != 0:
return
print(f'\nRunning privacy report for epoch: {epoch}\n')
logits_train = self.model.predict(x_train, batch_size=batch_size)
logits_test = self.model.predict(x_test, batch_size=batch_size)
prob_train = special.softmax(logits_train, axis=1)
prob_test = special.softmax(logits_test, axis=1)
# Add metadata to generate a privacy report.
privacy_report_metadata = PrivacyReportMetadata(
# Show the validation accuracy on the plot
# It's what you send to train_accuracy that gets plotted.
accuracy_train=logs['val_accuracy'],
accuracy_test=logs['val_accuracy'],
epoch_num=epoch,
model_variant_label=self.model_name)
attack_results = mia.run_attacks(
AttackInputData(
labels_train=y_train_indices[:, 0],
labels_test=y_test_indices[:, 0],
probs_train=prob_train,
probs_test=prob_test),
SlicingSpec(entire_dataset=True, by_class=True),
attack_types=(AttackType.THRESHOLD_ATTACK,
AttackType.LOGISTIC_REGRESSION),
privacy_report_metadata=privacy_report_metadata)
self.attack_results.append(attack_results)
Trenuj modelki
Następny blok kodu szkoli dwa modele. all_reports lista służy do zbierania wszystkich wyników ze wszystkich seriach treningowych modelu. Poszczególne raporty są oznaczone witht na model_name , więc nie ma zamieszania o który model wygenerowany Który raport.
all_reports = []
callback = PrivacyMetrics(epochs_per_report, "2 Layers")
history = model_2layers.fit(
x_train,
y_train,
batch_size=batch_size,
epochs=total_epochs,
validation_data=(x_test, y_test),
callbacks=[callback],
shuffle=True)
all_reports.extend(callback.attack_results)
Epoch 1/50 1000/1000 [==============================] - 13s 4ms/step - loss: 1.5146 - accuracy: 0.4573 - val_loss: 1.2374 - val_accuracy: 0.5660 Epoch 2/50 1000/1000 [==============================] - 3s 3ms/step - loss: 1.1933 - accuracy: 0.5811 - val_loss: 1.1873 - val_accuracy: 0.5851 Running privacy report for epoch: 2 Epoch 3/50 1000/1000 [==============================] - 3s 3ms/step - loss: 1.0694 - accuracy: 0.6246 - val_loss: 1.0526 - val_accuracy: 0.6310 Epoch 4/50 1000/1000 [==============================] - 3s 3ms/step - loss: 0.9911 - accuracy: 0.6548 - val_loss: 0.9906 - val_accuracy: 0.6549 Running privacy report for epoch: 4 Epoch 5/50 1000/1000 [==============================] - 3s 3ms/step - loss: 0.9348 - accuracy: 0.6743 - val_loss: 0.9712 - val_accuracy: 0.6617 Epoch 6/50 1000/1000 [==============================] - 3s 3ms/step - loss: 0.8881 - accuracy: 0.6912 - val_loss: 0.9595 - val_accuracy: 0.6671 Running privacy report for epoch: 6 Epoch 7/50 1000/1000 [==============================] - 3s 3ms/step - loss: 0.8495 - accuracy: 0.7024 - val_loss: 0.9574 - val_accuracy: 0.6684 Epoch 8/50 1000/1000 [==============================] - 3s 3ms/step - loss: 0.8147 - accuracy: 0.7161 - val_loss: 0.9397 - val_accuracy: 0.6740 Running privacy report for epoch: 8 Epoch 9/50 1000/1000 [==============================] - 3s 3ms/step - loss: 0.7820 - accuracy: 0.7263 - val_loss: 0.9325 - val_accuracy: 0.6837 Epoch 10/50 1000/1000 [==============================] - 3s 3ms/step - loss: 0.7533 - accuracy: 0.7362 - val_loss: 0.9431 - val_accuracy: 0.6843 Running privacy report for epoch: 10 Epoch 11/50 1000/1000 [==============================] - 3s 3ms/step - loss: 0.7169 - accuracy: 0.7477 - val_loss: 0.9310 - val_accuracy: 0.6795 Epoch 12/50 1000/1000 [==============================] - 3s 3ms/step - loss: 0.6892 - accuracy: 0.7569 - val_loss: 0.9043 - val_accuracy: 0.6975 Running privacy report for epoch: 12 Epoch 13/50 1000/1000 [==============================] - 3s 3ms/step - loss: 0.6677 - accuracy: 0.7663 - val_loss: 0.9401 - val_accuracy: 0.6796 Epoch 14/50 1000/1000 [==============================] - 3s 3ms/step - loss: 0.6401 - accuracy: 0.7741 - val_loss: 0.9464 - val_accuracy: 0.6880 Running privacy report for epoch: 14 Epoch 15/50 1000/1000 [==============================] - 3s 3ms/step - loss: 0.6177 - accuracy: 0.7821 - val_loss: 0.9359 - val_accuracy: 0.6930 Epoch 16/50 1000/1000 [==============================] - 3s 3ms/step - loss: 0.5978 - accuracy: 0.7913 - val_loss: 0.9634 - val_accuracy: 0.6896 Running privacy report for epoch: 16 Epoch 17/50 1000/1000 [==============================] - 3s 3ms/step - loss: 0.5745 - accuracy: 0.7973 - val_loss: 0.9941 - val_accuracy: 0.6932 Epoch 18/50 1000/1000 [==============================] - 3s 3ms/step - loss: 0.5553 - accuracy: 0.8036 - val_loss: 0.9790 - val_accuracy: 0.6974 Running privacy report for epoch: 18 Epoch 19/50 1000/1000 [==============================] - 3s 3ms/step - loss: 0.5376 - accuracy: 0.8103 - val_loss: 0.9989 - val_accuracy: 0.6907 Epoch 20/50 1000/1000 [==============================] - 3s 3ms/step - loss: 0.5152 - accuracy: 0.8192 - val_loss: 1.0245 - val_accuracy: 0.6878 Running privacy report for epoch: 20 Epoch 21/50 1000/1000 [==============================] - 3s 3ms/step - loss: 0.5048 - accuracy: 0.8208 - val_loss: 1.0223 - val_accuracy: 0.6852 Epoch 22/50 1000/1000 [==============================] - 3s 3ms/step - loss: 0.4847 - accuracy: 0.8284 - val_loss: 1.0498 - val_accuracy: 0.6866 Running privacy report for epoch: 22 Epoch 23/50 1000/1000 [==============================] - 3s 3ms/step - loss: 0.4722 - accuracy: 0.8325 - val_loss: 1.0610 - val_accuracy: 0.6899 Epoch 24/50 1000/1000 [==============================] - 3s 3ms/step - loss: 0.4562 - accuracy: 0.8387 - val_loss: 1.0973 - val_accuracy: 0.6771 Running privacy report for epoch: 24 Epoch 25/50 1000/1000 [==============================] - 3s 3ms/step - loss: 0.4392 - accuracy: 0.8447 - val_loss: 1.1141 - val_accuracy: 0.6865 Epoch 26/50 1000/1000 [==============================] - 3s 3ms/step - loss: 0.4269 - accuracy: 0.8485 - val_loss: 1.1928 - val_accuracy: 0.6771 Running privacy report for epoch: 26 Epoch 27/50 1000/1000 [==============================] - 3s 3ms/step - loss: 0.4135 - accuracy: 0.8533 - val_loss: 1.1945 - val_accuracy: 0.6758 Epoch 28/50 1000/1000 [==============================] - 3s 3ms/step - loss: 0.4053 - accuracy: 0.8569 - val_loss: 1.2244 - val_accuracy: 0.6716 Running privacy report for epoch: 28 Epoch 29/50 1000/1000 [==============================] - 3s 3ms/step - loss: 0.3880 - accuracy: 0.8611 - val_loss: 1.2362 - val_accuracy: 0.6789 Epoch 30/50 1000/1000 [==============================] - 3s 3ms/step - loss: 0.3805 - accuracy: 0.8630 - val_loss: 1.2815 - val_accuracy: 0.6805 Running privacy report for epoch: 30 Epoch 31/50 1000/1000 [==============================] - 3s 3ms/step - loss: 0.3756 - accuracy: 0.8656 - val_loss: 1.2973 - val_accuracy: 0.6762 Epoch 32/50 1000/1000 [==============================] - 3s 3ms/step - loss: 0.3565 - accuracy: 0.8719 - val_loss: 1.3022 - val_accuracy: 0.6810 Running privacy report for epoch: 32 Epoch 33/50 1000/1000 [==============================] - 3s 3ms/step - loss: 0.3494 - accuracy: 0.8749 - val_loss: 1.3248 - val_accuracy: 0.6756 Epoch 34/50 1000/1000 [==============================] - 3s 3ms/step - loss: 0.3371 - accuracy: 0.8790 - val_loss: 1.3941 - val_accuracy: 0.6806 Running privacy report for epoch: 34 Epoch 35/50 1000/1000 [==============================] - 3s 3ms/step - loss: 0.3248 - accuracy: 0.8839 - val_loss: 1.4391 - val_accuracy: 0.6666 Epoch 36/50 1000/1000 [==============================] - 3s 3ms/step - loss: 0.3233 - accuracy: 0.8833 - val_loss: 1.5060 - val_accuracy: 0.6692 Running privacy report for epoch: 36 Epoch 37/50 1000/1000 [==============================] - 3s 3ms/step - loss: 0.3109 - accuracy: 0.8882 - val_loss: 1.4624 - val_accuracy: 0.6724 Epoch 38/50 1000/1000 [==============================] - 3s 3ms/step - loss: 0.3057 - accuracy: 0.8900 - val_loss: 1.5133 - val_accuracy: 0.6644 Running privacy report for epoch: 38 Epoch 39/50 1000/1000 [==============================] - 3s 3ms/step - loss: 0.2929 - accuracy: 0.8949 - val_loss: 1.5465 - val_accuracy: 0.6618 Epoch 40/50 1000/1000 [==============================] - 3s 3ms/step - loss: 0.2868 - accuracy: 0.8970 - val_loss: 1.5882 - val_accuracy: 0.6696 Running privacy report for epoch: 40 Epoch 41/50 1000/1000 [==============================] - 3s 3ms/step - loss: 0.2778 - accuracy: 0.8982 - val_loss: 1.6317 - val_accuracy: 0.6713 Epoch 42/50 1000/1000 [==============================] - 3s 3ms/step - loss: 0.2782 - accuracy: 0.8999 - val_loss: 1.6993 - val_accuracy: 0.6630 Running privacy report for epoch: 42 Epoch 43/50 1000/1000 [==============================] - 3s 3ms/step - loss: 0.2675 - accuracy: 0.9039 - val_loss: 1.7294 - val_accuracy: 0.6645 Epoch 44/50 1000/1000 [==============================] - 3s 3ms/step - loss: 0.2587 - accuracy: 0.9068 - val_loss: 1.7614 - val_accuracy: 0.6561 Running privacy report for epoch: 44 Epoch 45/50 1000/1000 [==============================] - 3s 3ms/step - loss: 0.2528 - accuracy: 0.9076 - val_loss: 1.7835 - val_accuracy: 0.6564 Epoch 46/50 1000/1000 [==============================] - 3s 3ms/step - loss: 0.2410 - accuracy: 0.9129 - val_loss: 1.8550 - val_accuracy: 0.6648 Running privacy report for epoch: 46 Epoch 47/50 1000/1000 [==============================] - 3s 3ms/step - loss: 0.2409 - accuracy: 0.9106 - val_loss: 1.8705 - val_accuracy: 0.6572 Epoch 48/50 1000/1000 [==============================] - 3s 3ms/step - loss: 0.2328 - accuracy: 0.9146 - val_loss: 1.9110 - val_accuracy: 0.6593 Running privacy report for epoch: 48 Epoch 49/50 1000/1000 [==============================] - 3s 3ms/step - loss: 0.2299 - accuracy: 0.9164 - val_loss: 1.9468 - val_accuracy: 0.6634 Epoch 50/50 1000/1000 [==============================] - 3s 3ms/step - loss: 0.2250 - accuracy: 0.9178 - val_loss: 2.0154 - val_accuracy: 0.6610 Running privacy report for epoch: 50
callback = PrivacyMetrics(epochs_per_report, "3 Layers")
history = model_3layers.fit(
x_train,
y_train,
batch_size=batch_size,
epochs=total_epochs,
validation_data=(x_test, y_test),
callbacks=[callback],
shuffle=True)
all_reports.extend(callback.attack_results)
Epoch 1/50 1000/1000 [==============================] - 4s 4ms/step - loss: 1.6838 - accuracy: 0.3772 - val_loss: 1.4805 - val_accuracy: 0.4552 Epoch 2/50 1000/1000 [==============================] - 3s 3ms/step - loss: 1.3938 - accuracy: 0.4969 - val_loss: 1.3291 - val_accuracy: 0.5276 Running privacy report for epoch: 2 Epoch 3/50 1000/1000 [==============================] - 3s 3ms/step - loss: 1.2564 - accuracy: 0.5510 - val_loss: 1.2313 - val_accuracy: 0.5627 Epoch 4/50 1000/1000 [==============================] - 3s 3ms/step - loss: 1.1610 - accuracy: 0.5884 - val_loss: 1.1251 - val_accuracy: 0.6039 Running privacy report for epoch: 4 Epoch 5/50 1000/1000 [==============================] - 3s 3ms/step - loss: 1.1034 - accuracy: 0.6105 - val_loss: 1.1168 - val_accuracy: 0.6063 Epoch 6/50 1000/1000 [==============================] - 3s 3ms/step - loss: 1.0476 - accuracy: 0.6319 - val_loss: 1.0716 - val_accuracy: 0.6248 Running privacy report for epoch: 6 Epoch 7/50 1000/1000 [==============================] - 3s 3ms/step - loss: 1.0107 - accuracy: 0.6461 - val_loss: 1.0264 - val_accuracy: 0.6407 Epoch 8/50 1000/1000 [==============================] - 3s 3ms/step - loss: 0.9731 - accuracy: 0.6597 - val_loss: 1.0216 - val_accuracy: 0.6447 Running privacy report for epoch: 8 Epoch 9/50 1000/1000 [==============================] - 3s 3ms/step - loss: 0.9437 - accuracy: 0.6712 - val_loss: 1.0016 - val_accuracy: 0.6467 Epoch 10/50 1000/1000 [==============================] - 3s 3ms/step - loss: 0.9191 - accuracy: 0.6790 - val_loss: 0.9845 - val_accuracy: 0.6553 Running privacy report for epoch: 10 Epoch 11/50 1000/1000 [==============================] - 3s 3ms/step - loss: 0.8923 - accuracy: 0.6877 - val_loss: 0.9560 - val_accuracy: 0.6670 Epoch 12/50 1000/1000 [==============================] - 3s 3ms/step - loss: 0.8722 - accuracy: 0.6959 - val_loss: 0.9518 - val_accuracy: 0.6686 Running privacy report for epoch: 12 Epoch 13/50 1000/1000 [==============================] - 3s 3ms/step - loss: 0.8495 - accuracy: 0.7029 - val_loss: 0.9427 - val_accuracy: 0.6787 Epoch 14/50 1000/1000 [==============================] - 3s 3ms/step - loss: 0.8305 - accuracy: 0.7116 - val_loss: 0.9247 - val_accuracy: 0.6814 Running privacy report for epoch: 14 Epoch 15/50 1000/1000 [==============================] - 3s 3ms/step - loss: 0.8164 - accuracy: 0.7157 - val_loss: 0.9263 - val_accuracy: 0.6797 Epoch 16/50 1000/1000 [==============================] - 3s 3ms/step - loss: 0.7973 - accuracy: 0.7220 - val_loss: 0.9151 - val_accuracy: 0.6850 Running privacy report for epoch: 16 Epoch 17/50 1000/1000 [==============================] - 3s 3ms/step - loss: 0.7830 - accuracy: 0.7277 - val_loss: 0.9139 - val_accuracy: 0.6842 Epoch 18/50 1000/1000 [==============================] - 3s 3ms/step - loss: 0.7704 - accuracy: 0.7294 - val_loss: 0.9384 - val_accuracy: 0.6774 Running privacy report for epoch: 18 Epoch 19/50 1000/1000 [==============================] - 3s 3ms/step - loss: 0.7539 - accuracy: 0.7366 - val_loss: 0.9508 - val_accuracy: 0.6761 Epoch 20/50 1000/1000 [==============================] - 3s 3ms/step - loss: 0.7445 - accuracy: 0.7412 - val_loss: 0.9108 - val_accuracy: 0.6908 Running privacy report for epoch: 20 Epoch 21/50 1000/1000 [==============================] - 3s 3ms/step - loss: 0.7343 - accuracy: 0.7418 - val_loss: 0.9161 - val_accuracy: 0.6855 Epoch 22/50 1000/1000 [==============================] - 3s 3ms/step - loss: 0.7213 - accuracy: 0.7458 - val_loss: 0.9754 - val_accuracy: 0.6724 Running privacy report for epoch: 22 Epoch 23/50 1000/1000 [==============================] - 3s 3ms/step - loss: 0.7133 - accuracy: 0.7487 - val_loss: 0.8936 - val_accuracy: 0.6984 Epoch 24/50 1000/1000 [==============================] - 3s 3ms/step - loss: 0.7072 - accuracy: 0.7504 - val_loss: 0.8872 - val_accuracy: 0.7002 Running privacy report for epoch: 24 Epoch 25/50 1000/1000 [==============================] - 3s 3ms/step - loss: 0.6932 - accuracy: 0.7570 - val_loss: 0.9732 - val_accuracy: 0.6769 Epoch 26/50 1000/1000 [==============================] - 3s 3ms/step - loss: 0.6883 - accuracy: 0.7578 - val_loss: 0.9332 - val_accuracy: 0.6798 Running privacy report for epoch: 26 Epoch 27/50 1000/1000 [==============================] - 3s 3ms/step - loss: 0.6766 - accuracy: 0.7614 - val_loss: 0.9069 - val_accuracy: 0.6998 Epoch 28/50 1000/1000 [==============================] - 3s 3ms/step - loss: 0.6656 - accuracy: 0.7662 - val_loss: 0.8879 - val_accuracy: 0.7011 Running privacy report for epoch: 28 Epoch 29/50 1000/1000 [==============================] - 3s 3ms/step - loss: 0.6594 - accuracy: 0.7674 - val_loss: 0.8988 - val_accuracy: 0.7037 Epoch 30/50 1000/1000 [==============================] - 3s 3ms/step - loss: 0.6499 - accuracy: 0.7700 - val_loss: 0.9086 - val_accuracy: 0.7001 Running privacy report for epoch: 30 Epoch 31/50 1000/1000 [==============================] - 3s 3ms/step - loss: 0.6420 - accuracy: 0.7746 - val_loss: 0.8985 - val_accuracy: 0.7034 Epoch 32/50 1000/1000 [==============================] - 3s 3ms/step - loss: 0.6354 - accuracy: 0.7742 - val_loss: 0.9089 - val_accuracy: 0.7018 Running privacy report for epoch: 32 Epoch 33/50 1000/1000 [==============================] - 3s 3ms/step - loss: 0.6293 - accuracy: 0.7759 - val_loss: 0.9258 - val_accuracy: 0.6947 Epoch 34/50 1000/1000 [==============================] - 3s 3ms/step - loss: 0.6192 - accuracy: 0.7851 - val_loss: 0.9326 - val_accuracy: 0.6976 Running privacy report for epoch: 34 Epoch 35/50 1000/1000 [==============================] - 3s 3ms/step - loss: 0.6157 - accuracy: 0.7831 - val_loss: 0.9240 - val_accuracy: 0.6973 Epoch 36/50 1000/1000 [==============================] - 3s 3ms/step - loss: 0.6063 - accuracy: 0.7853 - val_loss: 0.9504 - val_accuracy: 0.6971 Running privacy report for epoch: 36 Epoch 37/50 1000/1000 [==============================] - 3s 3ms/step - loss: 0.6036 - accuracy: 0.7867 - val_loss: 0.9025 - val_accuracy: 0.7094 Epoch 38/50 1000/1000 [==============================] - 3s 3ms/step - loss: 0.5958 - accuracy: 0.7877 - val_loss: 0.9290 - val_accuracy: 0.6976 Running privacy report for epoch: 38 Epoch 39/50 1000/1000 [==============================] - 3s 3ms/step - loss: 0.5900 - accuracy: 0.7919 - val_loss: 0.9379 - val_accuracy: 0.6963 Epoch 40/50 1000/1000 [==============================] - 3s 3ms/step - loss: 0.5856 - accuracy: 0.7928 - val_loss: 0.9911 - val_accuracy: 0.6896 Running privacy report for epoch: 40 Epoch 41/50 1000/1000 [==============================] - 3s 3ms/step - loss: 0.5772 - accuracy: 0.7944 - val_loss: 0.9093 - val_accuracy: 0.7059 Epoch 42/50 1000/1000 [==============================] - 3s 3ms/step - loss: 0.5752 - accuracy: 0.7940 - val_loss: 0.9275 - val_accuracy: 0.7061 Running privacy report for epoch: 42 Epoch 43/50 1000/1000 [==============================] - 3s 3ms/step - loss: 0.5645 - accuracy: 0.7998 - val_loss: 0.9208 - val_accuracy: 0.7025 Epoch 44/50 1000/1000 [==============================] - 3s 3ms/step - loss: 0.5632 - accuracy: 0.8000 - val_loss: 0.9746 - val_accuracy: 0.6976 Running privacy report for epoch: 44 Epoch 45/50 1000/1000 [==============================] - 3s 3ms/step - loss: 0.5557 - accuracy: 0.8045 - val_loss: 0.9211 - val_accuracy: 0.7098 Epoch 46/50 1000/1000 [==============================] - 3s 3ms/step - loss: 0.5469 - accuracy: 0.8073 - val_loss: 0.9357 - val_accuracy: 0.7055 Running privacy report for epoch: 46 Epoch 47/50 1000/1000 [==============================] - 3s 3ms/step - loss: 0.5438 - accuracy: 0.8062 - val_loss: 0.9495 - val_accuracy: 0.7025 Epoch 48/50 1000/1000 [==============================] - 3s 3ms/step - loss: 0.5437 - accuracy: 0.8069 - val_loss: 0.9509 - val_accuracy: 0.6994 Running privacy report for epoch: 48 Epoch 49/50 1000/1000 [==============================] - 3s 3ms/step - loss: 0.5414 - accuracy: 0.8066 - val_loss: 0.9780 - val_accuracy: 0.6939 Epoch 50/50 1000/1000 [==============================] - 3s 3ms/step - loss: 0.5321 - accuracy: 0.8108 - val_loss: 1.0109 - val_accuracy: 0.6846 Running privacy report for epoch: 50
Wykresy epoki
Możesz wizualizować, w jaki sposób powstają zagrożenia prywatności podczas trenowania modeli, badając je okresowo (np. co 5 epok), możesz wybrać punkt w czasie z najlepszą kompromisem między wydajnością a prywatnością.
Użyj TF prywatności moduł Członkostwo Wnioskowanie atak wygenerować AttackResults . Te AttackResults się połączyć w na AttackResultsCollection . Raport TF prywatności jest przeznaczony do analizy dostarczonego AttackResultsCollection .
results = AttackResultsCollection(all_reports)
privacy_metrics = (PrivacyMetric.AUC, PrivacyMetric.ATTACKER_ADVANTAGE)
epoch_plot = privacy_report.plot_by_epochs(
results, privacy_metrics=privacy_metrics)
Zobacz, że z reguły wrażliwość na prywatność ma tendencję do zwiększania się wraz ze wzrostem liczby epok. Dotyczy to różnych wariantów modeli, a także różnych typów atakujących.
Modele dwuwarstwowe (z mniejszą liczbą warstw splotowych) są ogólnie bardziej podatne na ataki niż ich odpowiedniki w modelach trójwarstwowych.
Zobaczmy teraz, jak zmienia się wydajność modelu w odniesieniu do ryzyka prywatności.
Prywatność a narzędzia
privacy_metrics = (PrivacyMetric.AUC, PrivacyMetric.ATTACKER_ADVANTAGE)
utility_privacy_plot = privacy_report.plot_privacy_vs_accuracy(
results, privacy_metrics=privacy_metrics)
for axis in utility_privacy_plot.axes:
axis.set_xlabel('Validation accuracy')
Modele trójwarstwowe (być może z powodu zbyt wielu parametrów) osiągają dokładność zaledwie 0,85 pociągu. Modele dwuwarstwowe osiągają mniej więcej taką samą wydajność dla tego poziomu ryzyka prywatności, ale nadal zapewniają lepszą dokładność.
Możesz również zobaczyć, jak linia dla modeli dwuwarstwowych staje się bardziej stroma. Oznacza to, że dodatkowe marginalne korzyści w zakresie dokładności pociągów kosztują ogromne luki w prywatności.
To już koniec samouczka. Zapraszam do analizy własnych wyników.